|
| |
|
|
| |
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
TerraZyme
offers significant cost alternatives to standard road designs
Compared to this standard road design...
...this TerraZyme design can save 20% to 30% in costs...
...or up to 40% with this design |

|
|
oo |
Road stabilization
with TerraZyme offers significant economic alternatives to standard road
designs. In the following examples, TerraZyme-stabilized road options
are compared to standard road designs. Note that design strength has been
maintained while costs have been significantly reduced.
Standard Road Design
|
| |
 |
|
AASHTO Structural
Number modeling is supported by lab and field tests of stabilized materials
to verify strength comparisons between design options. Using published
correlations, standard test measurements are related to CBR values and
structural coefficients, allowing cost comparisons between designs of
similar strength.
|
TerraZyme
Alternative #1
|
| |
 |
|
Alternative #1 Maintains the
standard design strength while reducing or eliminating costly materials
through stabilization of local materials or economical material blends
for typical cost reductions of 20% - 30%. Laboratory verification of soil
blends can be performed before project execution.
|
TerraZyme Alternative
#2
|
| |
 |
| Alternative
# 2 improves the standard design through stabilization of available materials
blended to optimize gradation and plasticity. The result is a maximum increase
in stabilized strength. Note that savings of 40% are possible by thinking
outside of the standard design and road materials. Cost comparisons to matching
structural upgrades using traditional materials and designs generally favor
stabilization. |
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|